Baca Komik Karya Tony Wong
Dan salah satu cara buat bikin orang suka baca yg efektif, ya lewat komik. Filmnya sendiri diangkat dari komik Longhumen karya Tony Wong, yang konon.
PerBEZAan yang diTUNJUKkan ini jugak memBUKTIkan betapa GAGAL dan BANGSATnya sistem penDIDIKan VERNAKULAR CINA di NEGARA ini. Kenapa kita KAITkan dengan sistem penDIDIKan VERNAKULAR CINA? Ini kerana sudah menjadi tanggung-jawab DONG ZHONG dan DONG JIAO ZHONG untuk merangka sistem penDIDIKan bagi membentuk kePERIBADIan MULIA selari dengan keMAJUan dan keTAMADUNan NEGARA ini.
2000 Solved Problems in Digital Electronics. 47 downloads 387 Views 12MB Size. Solved Problems in Geophysics. 2000 solved problems in digital electronics by bali pdf download. 2000 Solved Problems in Digital Electronics. 39 downloads 290 Views 12MB Size. Solved Problems in Geophysics. 2000 solved problems in digital electronics by bali pdf free download rating. Research paper on organic farming 2017 sample phd research proposal in engineering term paper title page format pdf day spa business plan sample genetically modified food research paper free, confusing kids math homework nail polish company business plan homework organizer printable, projectile motion problem solving with solution problem.
PerBUATan ONG Sing Yee jelas sekali HASIL keGAGALan DIDIKkan di sekolah VERNAKULAR CINA yang bukan sahaja GAGAL mengajarnya BAHASA Kebangsaan, malah penDIDIKan MORAL jugak. Kita PERCAYA sekolah-sekolah di BENUA China jugak TIDAK mengajar para PELAJAR mereka berSIKAP seperti ONG Sing Yee ini. Kita jugak tak JUMPA adakah ini AJARan Confucius, Lao Tze atau mana-mana TOKOH FALSAFAH CINA. Kalau BACA KOMIK Alam PERWIRA karya Tony Wong pun kita tak JUMPA kisah MAHARAJA Zhou PIJAK GAMBAR Ji Fat atau Duke Ji Chang?
Malah, takde jugak terCATAT dalam SEJARAH menyatakan JENERAL MAO PIJAK GAMBAR JENERAL Chiang KAI SHEK? Jadik, kenapakah PRODUK HASIL DIDIkan VERNAKULAR CINA di NEGARA ini berSIKAP BIADAB? Adakah SIKAP ini WUJUD HASIL TARBIAH DONG ZHONG dan DONG JIAO ZHONG yang berKIBLATkan DAP La’anatullah? Baca seterusnya artikel penuh dari laman. DAP has no constructive educational policies. Since its founding years, the party’s policy has been one of opposing for the sake of opposing.
When MCA initiated the Tunku Abdul Rahman College, the DAP in 1968 “accused the MCA of using education to produce a race of fanatics who were prepared to sacrifice ordinary laws to the party machinery (source: NST 16th September 1968)”. [ JMD – very much like the DAP law-breakers we have now.] It further slandered MCA by saying that TAR College teachers would be “indoctrinated with the beliefs of MCA and that text books would be written to glorify MCA”. The DAP compared MCA’s proposed TAR College to schools in Germany turning out Hitler’s Youth who graduated into the Gestapo. This is the type of opposition leadership within DAP of yesteryears and the quality of its leadership has since deteriorated by employing new political gimmicks, malicious methods and destructive means to keep the DAP afloat. Not only does DAP wants to do nothing to the cause of Malaysian education, the DAP leadership also wants “others” not to do anything worthwhile towards education our younger children. Envious and jealous of MCA initiating the TAR College in 1968, the DAP spread malicious lies, sowed seeds of suspicions and doubts among the community just to sabotage a beneficial community project. If DAP had been successful in sabotaging the TAR College project, hundreds of thousands of Malaysians would be deprived of educational opportunities and careers.
To be exact, 40,500 TAR College graduates would be deprived by DAP of their educational opportunities and thousands of careers wiped out at the costs of nation-building. Today, DAP lies have been proven to be malicious and has further proven that those DAP leaders who made such lies are liars.
None of these graduates has been ‘indoctrinated” by MCA and not a single graduate turned out to be a Hitler Youth! [JMD – but these days it is alleged that most students in UTAR are pro-DAP. Irony.] There is a mentality among voters who support the DAP for the very reason that the opposition was needed to “voice their grievances” and to provide “checks and balances” in government. In reality, DAP is “morally and ethically incapable of voicing your grievances for the very simple reason that DAP leadership is no longer capable to protect your interests. DAP is predominantly occupied by protecting its own political survival. Recently the dAP has adopted “new political technologies” to survive.